On Thursday, January 26, 2012 a hearing was held in a Georgia courtroom to determine the eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as President of the United States. Anyone who has been a Tea Party member for more than a few months, and especially Tea Party Nation members, will be familiar with the issues that are driving this discussion.
The judge, Judge Michael Malihi, had ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court for the hearing, but Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski said that he will not be there, that Obama will not be there, and that all attempts at keeping him off any ballot will fail. Of course, the hearing came and went, and Obama and his attorney did not appear, and did not contact the court with any further explanation.
A loose transcript of portions of that hearing is available here.
There are numerous points of contention regarding Obama’s citizenship, birth certificate, Social Security number, and place of birth.
While viewing the electronic image submitted by the Obama camp of the birth certificate, even the untrained eye can distinguish abnormalities that show what is referred to as “layering”, a condition that indicates that the electronic image has been tampered with, rendering it invalid as proof of anything. Thus, we remain without tangible proof of the President’s US birth.
Both the father and step-father were not US citizens at any time in their lives. Minor v. Happersett, a Supreme Court decision from 1875, requires that in order to qualify to serve as president, a person must be a native-born US citizen, as opposed to a naturalized citizen. A native-born citizen is any person, whose parents were, at the time of the person’s birth, US citizens. Arguments have been made that this condition would also disqualify several other past presidents. But those are specious. The ruling says nothing of the place of birth, only referring to the citizenship of the parents.
It has been learned that the Social Security number for Barack Obama, from 1979, is fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama, shows that Obama was born in the year 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama. It’s a little like dead people voting…only different.
Obama’s Social Security number was found to have been issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Massachusetts. Which is fine, except Obama never lived there. Obama was living in Hawaii in 1977.
The serial number on his birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also, certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Records for Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama exist showing that he resided in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Records have been altered, forged, and/or redacted.
The evidence was heard, the law considered, and the hearing closed with the judge declaring that he will enter a “DEFAULT JUDGEMENT” by February 5, 2012. The Georgia Secretary of State has stated that he will follow the judge’s ruling. By all indications, and unless something changes Barack Hussein Obama will not appear on the Georgia presidential ballot in November.
But, if Obama is willing to forego the electoral votes from the State of Georgia, and does not challenge the ruling, then no decision is possible at the federal level. It may be the only option left open to the DNC and the Obama campaign. To challenge and then to lose that challenge could allow other state’s Secretaries to rule individually without benefit of court rulings from within their own states, and remove Obama’s name from their state’s ballots.
Will other states follow suit? Keep an eye on Arizona, Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, and Florida…just to name a few. It is probable that these states that have been abused by this administration will take up this cause for their own voters. I am minded of an old Charlie Daniels song named The South’s Gonna Do It Again.